Epistemology; Science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Statistics; Informatics

Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Science & Philosophy is an International, double-blind peer-reviewed, open access journal, published every six months (June-December). Science & Philosophy is a multidisciplinary journal and aims to publish original research articles but also short communication and review papers of general significance that are written clearly and well organized. The journal is a source of information for professionals in a wide range of scientific discipline. Both English and Italian languages are accepted for publications. The journal is oriented on the scientific analysis of social phenomena, both by developing research with quantitative and qualitative methods and by interpreting with philosophical criticism. Science & Philosophy has its focus in the study of social phenomena both macro and micro, using the interdisciplinary approach of the social sciences, from economics to law, from politics to sociology, from history to social statistics. The journal focuses on the analysis of both phenomena and trends, for designing local developments and systems ecology. Scientific analysis is supported by an ethic of sociability.

 

 

 

Section Policies

Volume 1 Issue 1 2013

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 1 Issue 2 2013

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 2 Issue 1 2014

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 2 Issue 2 2014

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 3 Issue 1 2015

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 3 Issue 2 2015

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 4 Issue 1 2016

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 4 Issue 2 2016

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 5 Issue 1 2017

Editors
  • Fabrizio Maturo
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 5 Issue 2 2017

Editors
  • Fabrizio Maturo
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 6 Issue 1 2018

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 6 Issue 2 2018

Editors
  • Fabrizio Maturo
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 7 Issue 1 2019

Editors
  • Fabrizio Maturo
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 7 Issue 2 2019

Editors
  • Fabrizio Maturo
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 8 Issue 1 2020

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 8 Issue 2 2020

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 9 Issue 1 2021

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 9 Issue 2 2021

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 10 Issue 1 2022

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 10 Issue 2 2022

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 11 Issue 1 2023

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 11 Issue 2 2023

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 12 Issue 1 2024

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 12 Issue 2 2024

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 13 Issue 1 2025

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

New Submissions

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

This journal has adopted a blind reviewing policy, where both the referee and author remain anonymous throughout the process. Please remove all identifying features from the paper itself, ensuring that authors’ identity is not revealed. However, this does not preclude Authors from citing their own works. However, authors must cite their works in a manner that does not make explicit their identity. Editors will email selected Reviewers the submission. Reviewers who agree to review the paper submit their comments, and select a recommendation. After the refereeing process is complete, a section editor will make a decision for acceptance or rejection. There are two types of revisions: major or minor. For a major revision, original referees will be invited to review the manuscript again. For a minor revision, no more reviews are required, the editor will make the final decision of acceptance if both the content and format are acceptable.

 

Publication Frequency

The Journal publishes two issues for each year.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The journal is committed to real and immediate open access for academic work. All the journal articles are free to access immediately from the date of publication. There is no charge for readers to download articles and reviews for their own scholarly use. Benefits of open access for authors include:

  • Free access for all users worldwide
  • Increased visibility and readership
  • Rapid publication
  • No spatial constraints
  • Authors can share their research papers on their personal web-pages (i.e. ResearchGate, etc.).

Science & Philosophy publishes open access articles under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) Licence. The Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY licence permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open-access article, as long as the author is properly attributed. Copyright on any research article published by SCIENCE & PHILOSOPHY is retained by the author(s). Authors grant SCIENCE & PHILOSOPHY a licence to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified. 
For further information, visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. The following logo will appear in any paper that will be published from the volume number 31/2016 onwards:

Creative Commonce Licence

 

Journal’s Policies

OPEN ACCESS POLICY, COPYRIGHT AND LICENSING TERMS

Science and Philosophy provides immediate open access to its content, based on the principle that making research freely available to the public fosters a broader and more effective global exchange of knowledge. The journal is committed to genuine and immediate open access for academic work. All articles are freely accessible from the date of publication, and there are no charges for readers to download articles and reviews for their personal scholarly use.

Benefits of open access for authors include:

  • Free access for all users worldwide
  • Increased visibility and readership
  • Rapid publication
  • No spatial or distribution constraints
  • Possibility for authors to share their articles on personal or academic platforms (e.g., ResearchGate)

Science and Philosophy publishes its articles under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. This license allows users to copy, distribute, and transmit the work, to adapt it, and to use it for commercial purposes, provided that the original author is properly credited. Both commercial and non-commercial re-use is permitted under the CC BY license, as long as appropriate attribution is given.

Copyright for any article published in Science and Philosophy is retained by the author(s). Authors grant the journal a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Furthermore, authors grant any third party the right to use the work freely, provided that the original authorship, citation details, and publisher are clearly acknowledged.

For more information, please visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The following logo will appear in all papers published from Volume 31 (2016) onwards.

 

PUBLICATION ETHICS AND MALPRACTICE STATEMENT, DUTIES OF EDITORS. AUTHORS, AND REFEREES, EDITORIAL PROCESS, AND REVIEW POLICY           

Science and Philosophy is committed to ensuring ethics in the publication and the quality of articles. The following duties outlined for editors, authors, and reviewers are based on the COPE Code of Conduct guidelines for Journal Editors. Editors, authors, and reviewers will also adhere to the submission guideline policies.

 

 

DUTIES OF EDITORS

Editors of Science and Philosophy are responsible for ensuring the integrity, fairness, and quality of the editorial process. Their duties include:

  • Publication Decisions: Based on the evaluations of the editorial review board, the editor may accept, reject, or request revisions to submitted manuscripts.
  • Review of Manuscripts: Each manuscript must be initially evaluated by the editor for originality and relevance to the aims and scope of Science and Philosophy, using appropriate tools and software. Suitable submissions are forwarded for double-blind peer review.
  • Fair Review: Editors must ensure that every manuscript is assessed based solely on its intellectual content, regardless of the authors’ gender, race, religion, nationality, or institutional affiliation.
  • Confidentiality: Editors must treat all submitted manuscripts as confidential documents. No information about a manuscript should be disclosed to anyone outside the editorial team, reviewers, or the publisher.
  • Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Editors must not use unpublished information from submitted manuscripts for their own research without the authors’ explicit written consent. Any potential conflict of interest must be declared and managed transparently.
  • Use of Plagiarism Detection: Editors are encouraged to use plagiarism detection software to ensure the originality of submitted manuscripts.
  • Timeliness and Communication: Editors should ensure an efficient editorial and peer review process and must reassign submissions if reviewers are unable to complete their reviews within a reasonable timeframe.

 

EDITORIAL PROCESS

Upon submission of a manuscript, the editorial office of Science and Philosophy conducts an initial evaluation to assess its relevance, scientific validity, and overall contribution to the journal’s thematic areas. Manuscripts are preliminarily reviewed for compliance with formatting guidelines, originality, and academic rigor. Submissions deemed unsuitable at this stage may be rejected without proceeding to peer review.

If the manuscript passes the initial check, it is forwarded for double-blind peer review. Independent experts in the relevant disciplines are invited to evaluate the manuscript. At least two review reports are required for each submission. Reviewers assess the quality, originality, methodological soundness, clarity, and ethical standards of the work. In case of substantial disagreement between reviewers, a third opinion may be requested.

Authors may be asked to revise their manuscript in response to the reviewers’ comments. The final decision regarding acceptance, revision, or rejection is taken by the Editor-in-Chief or the Associate Editor(s), based on the reviewers’ feedback and the scientific value of the manuscript.

 

Key Steps in the Editorial Process

Initial Check 
The editor assesses the structure, style, and compliance with journal guidelines. Originality and quality are also evaluated at this stage. Manuscripts failing to meet basic standards may be rejected without peer review.

Peer Review  
Science and Philosophy follows a double-blind review policy: the identities of authors and reviewers are kept anonymous. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise and must have no conflicts of interest. They are asked to evaluate the manuscript’s technical accuracy, methodology, analysis, and significance. Typically, reviewers are given four weeks to complete their evaluation, with possible extensions granted upon request.

Editorial Decision     
The Editor-in-Chief considers the reviewers’ recommendations, author responses, and overall scientific quality when making a decision. Outcomes include:

  • Acceptance
  • Rejection
  • Request for minor or major revisions

In the case of major revisions, the revised version may be returned to the original reviewers or sent for a new round of review.

Revision Process      
Authors are generally allowed up to two rounds of major revisions per manuscript. Revised submissions must include a marked-up version and a detailed response letter addressing each comment made by reviewers and editors.

Final Decision            
After the revision(s), the Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editor(s) will make the final decision based on the quality, clarity, and relevance of the manuscript to Science and Philosophy. Only those manuscripts that meet the journal’s standards are accepted for publication.

Production
Once accepted, the manuscript enters the production phase, which includes copyediting, layout formatting, and proofreading. Although the journal is structured into yearly volumes and two issues per year, articles are published online immediately upon completion of the production process.

 

DUTIES OF AUTHORS

Authors submitting to Science and Philosophy are expected to adhere to high standards of integrity, accuracy, and transparency. Their responsibilities include:

  • Reporting Standards: Authors must present an accurate account of their original research, accompanied by an objective discussion of its relevance and significance. Manuscripts must comply with the journal’s submission guidelines.
  • Originality: Submissions must be entirely original works. Authors must ensure that their manuscript does not contain any previously published material, unless it is clearly cited and justified.
  • Avoidance of Redundant or Duplicate Submission: Manuscripts must not be submitted to more than one journal at the same time. Redundant or duplicate publications—describing substantially the same research—are not acceptable.
  • Acknowledgement of Sources: All data, methods, and literature used in the research must be appropriately cited. Authors should acknowledge publications that have significantly influenced their work.
  • Authorship: Only those who have made a substantial contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the research should be listed as authors. All listed co-authors must approve the final version of the manuscript and agree to its submission.
  • Data Access and Retention: Authors may be asked to provide the raw data underlying their manuscript for editorial review and must retain such data for a reasonable period after publication.
  • Correction of Errors: If a significant error or inaccuracy is discovered after submission or publication, the author(s) are obliged to promptly notify the journal and cooperate in issuing a correction or retraction.
  • Plagiarism and Text Recycling: Manuscripts must not include plagiarized content or material reused from previous publications without proper citation. The journal may use plagiarism detection software to assess originality. Self-plagiarism (text recycling) must be explicitly disclosed and justified.
  • Fabrication or Manipulation of Data: Authors must not fabricate, manipulate, or falsify any data or images. All reported results must be supported by valid, unaltered data.
  • Use of Others’ Work: Any use of others' text, figures, or theories must be clearly cited. Verbatim excerpts must be placed within quotation marks and properly referenced.
  • Changes in Authorship: Requests for changes in authorship (including order of authors) after acceptance are not permitted unless under exceptional circumstances and subject to editorial approval.
  • Verification of Results: Upon request, authors should be ready to provide supporting documentation to verify the accuracy and validity of their findings.

 

DUTIES OF REVIEWERS

Reviewers play a critical role in maintaining the quality and integrity of publications in Science and Philosophy. They are expected to observe the following responsibilities:

  • Confidentiality: All information contained in the manuscript under review must be treated as confidential and must not be shared or discussed with others outside the review process.
  • Acknowledgement of Sources: Reviewers should verify that all relevant sources of data and prior research are properly cited. Any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript and other published or unpublished work known to the reviewer must be reported to the editor immediately.
  • Standards of Objectivity: Reviews must be conducted objectively. Reviewers should provide clear, constructive, and evidence-based feedback, avoiding personal criticism of the authors.
  • Promptness: If a reviewer is unable to complete the review within the agreed time frame, they should promptly inform the editor so that alternative reviewers can be contacted without delay.

 

 

REVIEW POLICY           
Science and Philosophy adopts a double-blind peer review policy, meaning that both the authors and the reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review process.

Authors are required to remove any identifying information from their manuscripts to ensure anonymity. While authors may cite their own previous work, such citations must be phrased in a way that does not reveal their identity.

Submissions are sent by the editorial office to selected reviewers via email. Reviewers who agree to assess the manuscript will provide written comments and select a recommendation based on the quality and relevance of the work.

At the end of the peer review process, a section editor evaluates the reviewers’ reports and decides whether the manuscript should be accepted, rejected, or revised.

There are two types of revisions:

  • Major revision: the revised manuscript will be sent back to the original reviewers for a second evaluation.
  • Minor revision: further external review is not required; the editor will verify that the revised manuscript meets all necessary criteria.

The final decision regarding acceptance is made by the editor, based on the reviewers’ comments, the quality of the manuscript, and its adherence to the journal’s editorial standards.

 

INSTRUCTION FOR PEER-REVIEWERS

Peer reviewers are expected to contribute to the quality and integrity of Science and Philosophy by providing objective, rigorous, and constructive evaluations of submitted manuscripts. The following guidelines outline the expectations and criteria for the peer review process.

  • Timeliness
    Reviewers are expected to respond to the editorial invitation by the date specified in the accompanying communication. If unable to complete the review within the required timeframe, the editorial office should be informed as soon as possible, so the manuscript may be reassigned without delay.
  • Confidentiality
    All manuscripts under review must be treated as confidential documents. Content must not be disclosed, discussed with third parties, or used for personal advantage. Reviewers must refrain from sharing the manuscript in any form.
  • Conflict of Interest
    Reviewers who identify a conflict of interest—whether personal, professional, or financial—should decline the invitation and notify the editorial office.
  • Scope and Focus of the Review
    Reviews should be based on academic merit and should avoid personal remarks. While reviewers are not required to correct grammatical errors, comments on clarity and language are welcomed when relevant to the understanding of the manuscript. The evaluation should consider the following aspects:
    • Originality and significance of the topic
    • Relevance to the scope of Science and Philosophy
    • Clarity and coherence of the structure and argumentation
    • Validity and appropriateness of methodology (if applicable)
    • Correctness of data or reasoning
    • Justification of conclusions
    • Use and citation of relevant literature
    • Overall contribution to the field
  • Structure of the Review
    The review should be structured, objective, and detailed. It is recommended to distinguish between major issues (which may affect publication) and minor issues (which concern presentation or formatting). The reviewer’s recommendation (accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject) must be clearly stated and justified.
  • Submission of the Review
    Completed reviews should be submitted via email to: fabmatu@gmail.com

The use of a specific template is not required. However, reviewers are encouraged to format their comments clearly, following the evaluation criteria outlined above.

 

 

PLAGIARISM POLICY

Science and Philosophy adheres to a strict policy on plagiarism, in line with international standards of academic integrity.

Plagiarism is defined as the presentation of another person’s work, words, ideas, or data as one’s own, without proper attribution. This includes, but is not limited to:

  • Copying text, figures, or tables from any source (published or unpublished) without proper citation or use of quotation marks;
  • Rephrasing content by merely replacing words with synonyms while retaining the original structure and meaning;
  • Failing to properly acknowledge sources of ideas or methods;
  • Reusing substantial parts of one's own previously published work without appropriate citation (self-plagiarism).

This policy applies to all content within a manuscript, including figures, figure legends, tables, and supplementary material. The following conditions are considered plagiarism regardless of:

  • The source (published article, website, book, or unpublished material);
  • Whether the original author copied the material themselves;
  • Whether the original author is known or anonymous;
  • Whether permission was granted to reuse the material;
  • Whether the reused material comes from the same author (i.e., self-plagiarism).

Manuscripts containing extensive sections of copied text or material will be immediately rejected and not considered for publication. Minor, unintentional forms of text recycling (e.g., in introductions or methods) may occur occasionally and are evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Editors may act upon direct observation or upon notification by reviewers or third parties.

All submitted manuscripts are checked using Turnitin® plagiarism detection software. Manuscripts showing a similarity index greater than 30% will not be considered for peer review or publication, except in cases where overlap is clearly justified and properly referenced (e.g., in methodological descriptions or standard references).

 

 

CITATION POLICY

Authors are required to properly acknowledge and cite all material derived from external sources, including previously published work by the same authors. Citations must be accurate, verifiable, and relevant to the content of the manuscript.

The following practices are expected:

  • All sources of ideas, data, images, or direct quotations must be cited with precision;
  • When applicable, authors must obtain permission to reuse copyrighted material;
  • Citations must reflect actual reading and understanding of the referenced sources;
  • Excessive self-citation or preferential citation of works by friends, colleagues, or institutions should be avoided;
  • Citations of non-academic content such as advertisements or promotional material are not appropriate.

In line with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), original wording taken directly from other publications must be placed in quotation marks and accompanied by a proper citation. This requirement also applies to the reuse of an author’s own previously published material (to avoid self-plagiarism).

Science and Philosophy adheres to COPE recommendations on citation manipulation and encourages reviewers and editors to monitor citation practices during the review process.

 

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE

Authors must disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest that could influence the objectivity or integrity of the submitted work. Conflicts may include, but are not limited to:

  • Financial interests (e.g., funding, consultancy, stock ownership, honoraria);
  • Institutional affiliations;
  • Personal relationships;
  • Academic or professional competition.

The disclosure must be provided in a separate document, as part of the letter of permission to publish, and is not required to appear directly within the manuscript.

The corresponding author is responsible for submitting a Conflict of Interest Statement on behalf of all co-authors. This statement must include all relevant affiliations, funding sources, and relationships that may be perceived as potential sources of bias.

If no conflicts of interest exist, the statement should read:
“The authors declare no competing financial interest.”

The editorial office reserves the right to request further clarification or documentation, and failure to disclose relevant conflicts may result in rejection or retraction of the article.

 

COAUTHOR NOTIFICATION

For manuscripts with multiple authors, it is essential to ensure that all contributors are properly acknowledged.

At the time of submission, the corresponding author must provide complete contact information for each coauthor, including:

  • Full name
  • Email address
  • Institutional affiliation
  • Mailing address
  • ORCID identifier (if available)

The corresponding author is responsible for confirming that all coauthors are aware of the submission and have explicitly agreed to be listed as coauthors. This confirmation must be included in the accompanying documentation submitted to the editorial office.

Only those who have made a substantial contribution to the research should be included as coauthors, in accordance with the authorship guidelines of Science and Philosophy.

 

CHANGES TO AUTHORSHIP

The list and order of authors must be carefully defined at the time of the initial submission. The submitted authorship list is considered final. Any changes, such as the addition, removal, or rearrangement of authors, are permitted only before the manuscript is accepted for publication and must be formally approved by the editorial office.

To request a change in authorship, the corresponding author must provide:

  • A clear and justified explanation for the proposed change;
  • A written statement (by email or letter) from all authors, confirming their consent to the modification;
  • In the case of addition or removal, a separate written confirmation from the author(s) concerned.

After the manuscript has been accepted, authorship changes are allowed only in exceptional or extenuating circumstances, and are subject to editorial evaluation. If the article has not yet been published online, the publication process will be suspended until a decision is made.

In cases where the manuscript has already been published online, an approved authorship change will result in the issuance of a corrigendum to update the public record.

 

 

ARTICLE RETRACTION & WITHDRAWAL

Scope and Purpose

This policy defines the procedures for the retraction or withdrawal of articles published in Science and Philosophy. The aim is to safeguard the integrity of the academic record in the presence of significant issues that may require correction or removal of published content.

 

Grounds for Retraction or Withdrawal

Retraction or withdrawal of an article may be considered in the following cases:

  • Plagiarism: Presence of substantial portions copied from other sources without proper attribution.
  • Fraudulent Data: Discovery of fabricated, falsified, or manipulated data affecting the credibility of the research.
  • Ethical Violations: Breaches of ethical standards, including unethical research practices, undisclosed conflicts of interest, or lack of informed consent.
  • Copyright Infringement: Use of material that violates the intellectual property rights of others.
  • Legal Issues: Compliance with legal obligations related to libel, defamation, or intellectual property claims.
  • Redundant Publication: Duplication of significant parts of previously published work without appropriate citation or justification.
  • Serious Errors: Identification of fundamental mistakes that invalidate the article’s conclusions or compromise its scientific merit.

 

Decision-Making Process

  • The Editor-in-Chief, in consultation with the editorial board, will assess the situation and determine the appropriate action.
  • The corresponding author will be informed and given the opportunity to respond to the concerns raised.
  • If the concerns are substantiated, the Editor-in-Chief will make a final decision regarding retraction or withdrawal, considering the severity of the issue and its impact on the scholarly record.

 

Notification and Public Statement

  • A retraction or withdrawal notice will be published promptly, clearly stating the reasons for the decision.
  • The notice will be linked to the original article, ensuring full transparency.
  • In cases involving legal or ethical implications, the notice may include disclaimers or additional clarifications upon legal advice.

 

Archiving

  • Retracted or withdrawn articles will remain accessible in the journal's official archive to preserve the historical record.
  • Such articles will be clearly labeled as retracted or withdrawn in the electronic archive, to prevent further citation or misuse.

 

Appeals and Corrections

  • Authors may appeal a retraction or withdrawal decision by providing detailed evidence to contest the findings.
  • In cases where a retraction is not warranted, corrections may be issued in the form of errata, corrigenda, or supplementary notes, with appropriate reference and disclosure to the readership

 

 

ARTICLE REPLACEMENT

In cases where a published article is found to contain significant errors that may pose a risk or mislead readers, the authors may request to retract the flawed version and submit a corrected edition for republication.

The standard retraction procedure will apply. In addition, the retraction notice will include a direct link to the corrected version of the article.

To ensure transparency, a complete publication history will be maintained. This includes the original publication date, the retraction notice, and the date of the corrected article’s republication, along with a summary of the key changes introduced.

This policy ensures that the scholarly record remains accurate while allowing the correction of honest errors that do not stem from misconduct.

 

AUTHOR APPEALS & COMPLAINT

Authors have the right to appeal editorial decisions if they believe an error in judgment has occurred.

Requests for appeal must be submitted by email to the Editorial Office and must include:

  • A detailed explanation of the reasons for the appeal;
  • A point-by-point response to the comments made by the reviewers and/or editor.

The appeal will be reviewed by the Journal Manager, in consultation with the Editor-in-Chief and the Editorial Team. After careful evaluation, a final decision will be made. No further appeal will be accepted once a decision has been rendered.

Any complaints concerning editorial handling, publication procedures, or related matters should be addressed to:
???? fabmatu@gmail.com

All complaints will be handled in accordance with the ethical standards and procedures outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

 

ARCHIVING POLICY AND PRE-PRINT POLICY

ARCHIVING POLICY

To ensure the long-term preservation and accessibility of its content, Science and Philosophy implements a formal archiving policy in collaboration with institutional and technical partners.

A complete archival copy of all published articles is deposited, both in electronic and print format, at the National Library of Florence (Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze, Italy). In addition, the journal's contents are preserved through the PKP Private LOCKSS Network, which provides distributed digital preservation.

Authors are encouraged to self-archive the final published version (PDF) of their articles in institutional repositories, particularly those listed in the Directory of Open Access Repositories (OpenDOAR), for the purposes of open dissemination and academic visibility.

Science and Philosophy retains submitted manuscripts and related materials for internal record-keeping. However, if a manuscript is rejected, authors may request the deletion of their files from the editorial database, and such requests will be honored.

 

PRE-PRINT POLICY

Science and Philosophy acknowledges the importance of pre-print dissemination in promoting early scientific dialogue, accelerating research visibility, and encouraging collaboration, particularly within the field of mathematics.

Pre-Print Submission

Authors are permitted to upload their manuscripts to recognized pre-print servers prior to formal submission. The pre-print version must clearly indicate that the manuscript is original, has not been peer-reviewed, and has not been published elsewhere. Compliance with the specific policies of the selected pre-print platform is the responsibility of the authors.

Manuscript Consideration

Posting a pre-print does not preclude submission to Science and Philosophy. Manuscripts previously available as pre-prints will be considered for publication, provided they have not undergone peer review elsewhere.

Transparency and Acknowledgment

Authors must declare the existence of a pre-print version at the time of submission. A statement including the pre-print’s title, version, and DOI must be included in the cover letter or accompanying documentation. Any public comments or feedback received during the pre-print phase should be acknowledged where relevant.

Impact on Peer Review

The presence of a pre-print does not affect the journal’s double-blind peer review process. Submitted manuscripts will be reviewed according to the same editorial standards as all other submissions.

Revision and Publication

If accepted, the final version of the manuscript will be subject to copyediting and formatting according to the journal’s guidelines. A distinct DOI will be assigned, differentiating it from the pre-print version.

Citation of Pre-Prints

If cited, pre-print versions must be properly referenced, including title, authors, server name, and DOI. Authors are encouraged to update such citations to reflect the final published version when available.

Embargoed Pre-Prints

The journal permits the posting of embargoed pre-prints, provided the embargo period is consistent with Science and Philosophy’s policies. Once the embargo expires, the pre-print may be made openly accessible.

Policy Updates

This pre-print policy may be revised periodically. Any updates will be communicated via the journal’s website.

By adhering to this policy, Science and Philosophy aims to balance openness in research dissemination with the standards of rigorous peer-reviewed publication.

 

DATA SHARING AND REPRODUCIBILITY

cience and Philosophy upholds the principles of transparency, openness, and reproducibility as essential components of rigorous scientific research. The following policy outlines the expectations regarding data and code sharing, with the aim of supporting high-quality and verifiable contributions in the field of mathematics and related disciplines.

1. Data Availability

Authors are required to provide detailed information on the data underlying their research, including raw data, processed datasets, and any supplementary materials necessary to allow replication. Data should be deposited in publicly accessible repositories or made available through the journal’s designated platforms.

2. Data Accessibility

When choosing repositories, authors are encouraged to use widely recognized and reliable platforms that ensure long-term access. If public deposition is not possible (e.g., due to privacy or legal constraints), alternative access arrangements must be clearly communicated. Adequate metadata must be included to support understanding and reuse of the data.

3. Code and Algorithms

Authors are encouraged to share the code, scripts, and algorithms used in their analysis. These materials should be submitted as supplementary files or made available in open repositories, to facilitate reproducibility and promote further research.

4. Reproducibility Statement

Each manuscript must include a reproducibility statement describing:

  • The availability and location of data and code;
  • Any restrictions on access (e.g., ethical or legal limitations);
  • The steps taken to ensure that the study can be replicated.

5. Peer Review and Verification

During the peer review process, reviewers may request access to data and code. Authors are expected to provide such materials promptly upon request. Replicability of results is considered an integral part of the journal’s quality assurance process.

6. Exceptions and Special Cases

In cases where full sharing of data or code is not feasible, authors should contact the editorial office in advance to discuss appropriate solutions that remain consistent with the journal’s commitment to transparency and scientific integrity.

 

JOURNAL'S POLICY ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Science and Philosophy recognizes the importance of safeguarding the intellectual property rights of authors, while promoting the ethical and responsible dissemination of scholarly work. The journal’s policy aims to balance innovation, accessibility, and integrity.

Author Responsibilities

  • Originality and Attribution: Authors must submit original work that has not been published elsewhere. Proper attribution to all sources—published or unpublished—is required. When using copyrighted material, authors must ensure compliance with fair use or obtain explicit permission from rights holders.
  • Plagiarism and Misrepresentation: Plagiarism or misrepresentation in any form is strictly prohibited. This includes unacknowledged use of others’ ideas, text, images, or data, as well as unreferenced reuse of one’s own previously published content.

Journal Rights and Responsibilities

  • Publication and Licensing: By submitting a manuscript, authors grant Science and Philosophy the right to publish and disseminate the work. The journal typically adopts Creative Commons licenses, which specify terms of reuse and sharing.
  • Permissions and Copyright: Authors are responsible for securing all necessary permissions for third-party content included in their manuscript. Proof of such permissions must be provided before publication.
  • Author Rights Protection: Authors retain copyright over their published work. The journal holds an exclusive license to publish, but authors may reuse, reproduce, or disseminate their work, provided the original publication in Science and Philosophy is properly cited.

Open Access and Archiving

The journal adheres to open access principles and engages in long-term archiving initiatives to ensure that content remains freely available and permanently accessible.

Dispute Resolution

In case of concerns or disputes regarding intellectual property, the editorial office will facilitate a fair and timely resolution. All parties—authors, reviewers, and readers—are encouraged to contact the editorial team to report issues related to ownership, attribution, or misuse of intellectual contributions.

 

JOURNAL'S OPTIONS FOR POST-PUBLICATION DISCUSSIONS AND CORRECTIONS

Science and Philosophy supports the ongoing development of scholarly dialogue and the integrity of the academic record through structured mechanisms for post-publication engagement and correction.

Post-Publication Discussions

Authors are encouraged to submit replies or response articles that address previously published work in the journal. These contributions may offer additional insights, clarifications, or alternative viewpoints, and are subject to editorial review prior to publication.

Corrections and Updates

  • Errata Section: A dedicated section is maintained to publish corrections of factual errors or inaccuracies in published articles. This ensures transparency and the reliability of the scholarly record.
  • Corrections Process: Authors are expected to notify the editorial office promptly upon identifying any errors. The editorial team will coordinate with the authors to prepare and publish formal errata, corrigenda, or updates, as appropriate.

Editorial Oversight

  • Editorial Review of Corrections: All corrections are subject to editorial review to verify their validity and relevance. This process ensures that updates are accurate, appropriate, and fully documented.
  • Editorial Expressions of Concern: In cases where there are unresolved concerns about the validity or integrity of a published article, the journal may issue an Editorial Expression of Concern. This statement serves to inform readers while investigations are ongoing.

 

 

JOURNAL'S POLICY ON ETHICAL OVERSIGHT

Science and Philosophy is committed to maintaining the highest standards of ethics, integrity, and responsibility in mathematical research. The following policy outlines expectations for ethical conduct by authors, reviewers, and editors to protect research quality, participant rights, and the credibility of the publication process.

1. Author Responsibilities

  • Originality and Plagiarism: Submitted manuscripts must be original and not published elsewhere. The use of others’ words, data, or ideas without proper citation constitutes plagiarism and is strictly prohibited.
  • Authorship: All listed authors must have contributed significantly to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study. Any changes to authorship after submission must be communicated to the editorial office and appropriately justified.
  • Data Integrity: Authors must ensure the accuracy and transparency of their data. Fabrication, falsification, or selective reporting are unethical. Upon request, raw data and methodological details must be made available for editorial review.

 

2. Peer Review Process

  • Fair and Unbiased Review: Peer review is conducted objectively, based on academic merit. Reviewers are selected for their expertise, and any conflicts of interest are actively managed. Authors may suggest alternative reviewers where appropriate.
  • Confidentiality: All manuscripts under review are treated as confidential documents. Reviewers are prohibited from sharing or discussing the content outside of the peer review process. Author identities are protected under the journal’s double-blind policy.

 

3. Ethical Treatment of Research Subjects

  • Research Involving Humans or Animals: Authors must obtain prior ethical approval from an institutional review board or ethics committee. Informed consent must be secured, and all research should comply with international ethical standards and regulations.
  • Patient Privacy and Consent: Studies involving patient data require explicit informed consent. Identifiable information must not be published without the individual’s written permission.

 

4. Publication Ethics

  • Conflicts of Interest: All parties involved in the editorial process (authors, reviewers, editors) must disclose any potential conflicts of interest. These will be managed transparently to ensure unbiased publication decisions.
  • Corrections and Retractions: Authors are expected to promptly inform the editorial office of significant errors. Corrections will be published as necessary, and retractions will be issued when ethical concerns are confirmed.

 

5. Editorial Responsibilities

  • Editorial Decision-Making: Editorial decisions are made solely on academic merit, with no discrimination based on gender, ethnicity, institutional affiliation, or other non-academic criteria.
  • Editorial Independence: Editors operate free from commercial or political pressure. Decisions are guided exclusively by scholarly standards and ethical guidelines.

 

6. Enforcement and Reporting

  • Reporting Ethical Concerns: Authors, reviewers, and readers are encouraged to report ethical issues to the editorial office. All concerns will be reviewed, and appropriate actions will be taken in accordance with recognized standards (e.g., COPE guidelines).

 

By adhering to these policies, Science and Philosophy promotes a culture of trust, transparency, and excellence in academic publishing.

 

 

ACCESSIBILITY STATEMENT

Science and Philosophy is committed to ensuring free and unrestricted access to its published content, in line with its mission to support the global dissemination of mathematical knowledge.

Open Access

All articles published in the journal are freely accessible through the official website, without the need for subscription or payment. Readers are permitted to view, download, and share content without restrictions.

No Subscription or Pay-Per-View Fees

The journal does not charge subscription fees to individuals, institutions, or libraries. Likewise, no pay-per-view costs apply for accessing individual articles. This approach supports inclusivity and enhances the global visibility of the published research.

Author Rights to Share

Authors retain the copyright of their original work. They are permitted to distribute and archive the final published version without restrictions, provided that proper citation to the original publication in Science and Philosophy is included.

Permanent and Free Archiving

All content is permanently archived and freely accessible. Readers can consult past volumes and issues without access barriers, ensuring long-term preservation and availability of the scholarly record.

Searchability and Indexing

Articles are indexed and searchable via academic databases and search engines, enhancing discoverability by researchers, educators, and students worldwide.

 

 

 

REVENUE SOURCES STATEMENT

Science and Philosophy adopts a transparent approach regarding the financial sustainability of its operations. The journal provides the following overview of its revenue sources and business model, aimed at supporting open-access publishing and ensuring the continued dissemination of high-quality scholarly work.

Author Fees

A nominal author fee of 50€ is requested upon acceptance of a manuscript. This contribution supports the editorial workflow, production services, and maintenance of the open-access infrastructure. The fee is applied only after acceptance and does not influence editorial decisions.

Open Access Model

The journal operates on a fully open-access model, granting unrestricted and free access to all published content. This ensures that scholarly output is readily available to a global audience without financial barriers.

No Subscription or Pay-Per-View Fees

No subscription fees are charged to individual readers, institutions, or libraries. Likewise, the journal does not impose pay-per-view charges, reinforcing its commitment to free academic dissemination.

Advertising

Where applicable, the journal may include responsible advertising to support its operations. Any advertisements will be clearly separated from editorial content and will have no influence on editorial decisions.

Institutional and Organizational Support

Science and Philosophy may receive institutional support, grants, or collaborative funding from entities that share its mission of promoting mathematical research and open scholarship.

Reprints

Reprints of published articles may be offered upon request, subject to production and distribution costs. Information regarding availability and pricing will be clearly provided on the journal’s website.

 

POLICY ON DIRECT MARKETING

Science and Philosophy acknowledges the value of direct marketing in promoting engagement with potential authors, reviewers, and readers. All marketing activities are conducted in accordance with ethical standards, prioritizing relevance, transparency, and respect for privacy.

Appropriateness

Direct marketing initiatives are carried out with careful consideration, targeting individuals and institutions with a demonstrated or potential interest in the journal's thematic areas, particularly in mathematics and related fields.

Targeted Communication

Efforts are made to ensure that promotional content is directed toward recipients whose professional profiles align with the scope and objectives of Science and Philosophy. This targeted approach enhances the relevance and effectiveness of outreach communications.

Non-Intrusiveness

Marketing messages are designed to be non-intrusive. Communication frequency is kept to a minimum, and excessive or repetitive messaging is avoided to respect the recipients’ preferences and time.

Accuracy and Truthfulness

All information conveyed in marketing materials must be factually accurate, clearly written, and free from exaggeration or misleading content. Descriptions of the journal’s scope, editorial policies, and publication benefits reflect its actual practices and commitments.

Transparency

The journal provides full disclosure regarding the purpose and content of direct communications. Recipients are informed about how their contact information is used and can access further details upon request.

Respect for Opt-Out Requests

Recipients have the right to opt out of receiving future communications. Unsubscribe or opt-out requests are handled promptly and in accordance with applicable privacy and data protection regulations.

Regulatory Compliance

All direct marketing practices comply with relevant data protection and privacy legislation, including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and other applicable national or international standards.

 

 

About the Publisher: Accademia Piceno–Aprutina dei Velati in Teramo

Science and Philosophy is published by the Accademia Piceno–Aprutina dei Velati in Teramo, a cultural and scientific institution whose historical origins trace back to the year 1598. Originally established by Jesuit scholar Sertorio Caputo, the academy operated for nearly three centuries under the name Accademia Arcadica. In 1988, it was reestablished in its current form by a group of university professors, with the aim of promoting multidisciplinary research and fostering collaboration across academic disciplines.

The word "Velati" in the Academy's name conveys a strong emphasis on cooperative scholarship, symbolizing a preference for collective work and cultural dialogue rather than individualism.

The Academy’s emblem is based on the “Lapide delle Male Lingue”, a 15th-century bas-relief found in Teramo. The relief depicts two faces in profile, each with their tongue pierced by an open compass, accompanied by the inscription "Alo parlare agi mesura" ("Measure your words"). This historical symbol, associated with political conflicts in medieval Teramo, has been adopted by the Academy as a reminder of ethical communication and thoughtful scholarly discourse.

Now preserved in the municipal council chamber of Teramo, the stone relief reflects the Academy’s commitment to cultural integrity, interdisciplinary dialogue, and responsible research. Through its editorial initiatives, including the journal Science and Philosophy, the Academy supports and disseminates scholarly contributions that align with its mission of promoting critical thinking and intellectual collaboration.