Understanding Scientific Inquiry

Peter J. Veazie

Abstract


Science is a process of inquiry: a process of asking and answering questions.  However, a good question is more than an interrogatory, and a good answer is more than information: there are logical constraints that dictate when a question is answerable and what qualifies as an answer.  This paper will provide an understanding of (1) when a question is answerable, (2) when a question is not ready to be asked, (3) when a question is trivial, (4) what is required for a response to be an answer, and (5) what sequence of inquiry is required to identify an answer.  Equipped with this understanding, a scientist can better determine an appropriate sequence of study for a research program as well as identify the necessary arguments to warrant claims of understanding, funding, and the publication of research findings.

Keywords


Erotetics; research questions; research philosophy

Full Text:

PDF

References


RESCHER, N. 2000. Inquiry dynamics, New Brunswick, N.J., Transaction Publishers.

SCHA, R. J. H. 1983. Logical Foundations for Question Answering, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, Philips Research Laboratories.

WIŚNIEWSKI, A. 1995. The posing of questions : logical foundations of erotetic inferences, Dordrecht ; Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23756/sp.v6i2.437

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Peter J. Veazie

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Science & Philosophy - Journal of Epistemology, Science and Philosophy. ISSN 2282-7757; eISSN  2282-7765.