The Paradox of Anti-Democratic Arguments: a defence of democratic principles in debate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23756/sp.v11i2.1372Keywords:
cognitive dissonance, political philosophy, Leon FestingerAbstract
Conventional approaches in pro- or anti-democratic discourses often scrutinize the efficacy of leadership based on its outcomes, or explore the moral foundations of different systems. Contrary to these approaches, my argument presented in this paper is grounded in the inherent psychological desire to be heard and accepted. I posit that the essence of democracy resides in free discussion — a value even embraced by committed anti-democrats in the context of debates, as their acknowledgment hinges on it. This article presents an argument, developed based on my experience in actual debates called The Paradox of Anti-Democratic Arguments, to counter anti-democratic debaters who question the legitimacy of democratic norms. The article discusses the practical application of the argument in debates and casual discussions, its limitations and highlights the underlying psychological processes that make the argument effective in the context of Leon Festinger’s theory of cognitive dissonance.
Per leggere l'articolo completo, accedi con un abbonamento attivo. (To read the full article, log in with an active subscription.)
References
[ ] Herre, B. (2013). Democracy. Our World in Data. Retrieved on March 18, 2023, from https://ourworldindata.org/democracy?insight=the-world-has-recently-become-less-democratic#key-insights
Foa, R.S., Klassen, A., Slade, M., Rand, A. and R. Collins. (2020). “The Global Satisfaction with Democracy Report 2020.” Cambridge, United Kingdom: Centre for the Future of Democracy. Retrieved on March 18, 2023, from https://www.bennettinstitute.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/DemocracyReport2020_nYqqWi0.pdf.
Kürti, L. (2020). Orbánism: The Culture of Illiberalism in Hungary. Ethnologia Europaea, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.16995/ee.1055
European Parliament. (July, 2022). EP leaders condemn Prime Minister Orbán’s recent racist declarations. Retrieved on March 18, 2023, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20220730IPR36709/ep-leaders-condemn-prime-minister-orban-s-recent-racist-declarations
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. (2022). European Parliament Leaders Condemn Orban For “Openly Racist” Remarks. RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Retrieved on March 18, 2023, from https://www.rferl.org/a/european-parliament-orban-racist-remarks/31966820.html.
Gehrke, L. (2020). Hungary no longer a democracy, Freedom House says. POLITICO. Retrieved on March 18, 2023, from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/06/hungary-no-longer-a-democracy-report-239807
European Parliament (September, 2022). MEPs: Hungary can no longer be considered a full democracy | News | European Parliament. Retrieved on March 18, 2023, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20220909IPR40137/meps-hungary-can-no-longer-be-considered-a-full-democracy
Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (Eds.). (2005). Deductive reasoning. In The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-82417-0.
Habermas, J., Lennox, S., & Lennox, F. (1974). The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article (1964). New German Critique, 49–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/487737
[ 0] Hayek, F. A. (1990). The Constitution of Liberty. Psychology Press. pp. 162-193.
] “Parliament.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, Retrieved on Dec. 6, 2023, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/parliament.
[ 2] Tuckness, A. (2005). Locke’s Political Philosophy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved March 18, 2023, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke-political/
[ 3] Locke, J. (2002). The Second Treatise of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. Courier Corporation. Sect. 6.
Locke, J. (2002). The Second Treatise of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. Courier Corporation. Sect. 135.
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2016). The Mechanics of Motivated Reasoning. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.3.133
Festinger, L., & Schachter, S. (2013). When Prophecy Fails. Simon and Schuster.
Festinger, L. (1962). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press. pp. 93-102.
Festinger, L. (1962). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press. pp. 93-102.
[ 9] Sunay, R. (2012). The Importance of Public Debate in Democratic Regimes. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 8(9), 34-45. https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/download/144/149
Popper, K. (2012). The Open Society and Its Enemies. Routledge. p. 581.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The journal is committed to real and immediate open access for academic work. All of the journal articles are free to access immediately from the date of publication. There are no charge for readers to download articles and reviews for their own scholarly use. Benefits of open access for authors, include:
- Free access for all users worldwide
- Increased visibility and readership
- Rapid publication
- No spatial constraints
- Authors can share their research papers on their personal web-pages (i.e. ResearchGate, etc.)
Copyright and Licensing Terms
SCIENCE & PHILOSOPHY publishes open access articles under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open-access article, as long as the author is properly attributed. Copyright on any research article published by SCIENCE & PHILOSOPHY is retained by the author(s). Authors grant SCIENCE & PHILOSOPHY a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
For further information visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. The following logo will appear in any paper that will be published from the volume number 31/2016 onwards:
