The Paradox of Anti-Democratic Arguments: a defence of democratic principles in debate

Aron B Bekesi

Abstract


Conventional approaches in pro- or anti-democratic discourses often scrutinize the efficacy of leadership based on its outcomes, or explore the moral foundations of different systems. Contrary to these approaches, my argument presented in this paper is grounded in the inherent psychological desire to be heard and accepted. I posit that the essence of democracy resides in free discussion — a value even embraced by committed anti-democrats in the context of debates, as their acknowledgment hinges on it. This article presents an argument, developed based on my experience in actual debates called The Paradox of Anti-Democratic Arguments, to counter anti-democratic debaters who question the legitimacy of democratic norms. The article discusses the practical application of the argument in debates and casual discussions, its limitations and highlights the underlying psychological processes that make the argument effective in the context of Leon Festinger’s theory of cognitive dissonance. 


Keywords


cognitive dissonance; political philosophy; Leon Festinger

Full Text:

PDF

References


[ ] Herre, B. (2013). Democracy. Our World in Data. Retrieved on March 18, 2023, from https://ourworldindata.org/democracy?insight=the-world-has-recently-become-less-democratic#key-insights

Foa, R.S., Klassen, A., Slade, M., Rand, A. and R. Collins. (2020). “The Global Satisfaction with Democracy Report 2020.” Cambridge, United Kingdom: Centre for the Future of Democracy. Retrieved on March 18, 2023, from https://www.bennettinstitute.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/DemocracyReport2020_nYqqWi0.pdf.

Kürti, L. (2020). Orbánism: The Culture of Illiberalism in Hungary. Ethnologia Europaea, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.16995/ee.1055

European Parliament. (July, 2022). EP leaders condemn Prime Minister Orbán’s recent racist declarations. Retrieved on March 18, 2023, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20220730IPR36709/ep-leaders-condemn-prime-minister-orban-s-recent-racist-declarations

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. (2022). European Parliament Leaders Condemn Orban For “Openly Racist” Remarks. RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Retrieved on March 18, 2023, from https://www.rferl.org/a/european-parliament-orban-racist-remarks/31966820.html.

Gehrke, L. (2020). Hungary no longer a democracy, Freedom House says. POLITICO. Retrieved on March 18, 2023, from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/06/hungary-no-longer-a-democracy-report-239807

European Parliament (September, 2022). MEPs: Hungary can no longer be considered a full democracy | News | European Parliament. Retrieved on March 18, 2023, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20220909IPR40137/meps-hungary-can-no-longer-be-considered-a-full-democracy

Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (Eds.). (2005). Deductive reasoning. In The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-82417-0.

Habermas, J., Lennox, S., & Lennox, F. (1974). The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article (1964). New German Critique, 49–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/487737

[ 0] Hayek, F. A. (1990). The Constitution of Liberty. Psychology Press. pp. 162-193.

] “Parliament.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, Retrieved on Dec. 6, 2023, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/parliament.

[ 2] Tuckness, A. (2005). Locke’s Political Philosophy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved March 18, 2023, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke-political/

[ 3] Locke, J. (2002). The Second Treatise of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. Courier Corporation. Sect. 6.

Locke, J. (2002). The Second Treatise of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. Courier Corporation. Sect. 135.

Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2016). The Mechanics of Motivated Reasoning. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.3.133

Festinger, L., & Schachter, S. (2013). When Prophecy Fails. Simon and Schuster.

Festinger, L. (1962). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press. pp. 93-102.

Festinger, L. (1962). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press. pp. 93-102.

[ 9] Sunay, R. (2012). The Importance of Public Debate in Democratic Regimes. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 8(9), 34-45. https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/download/144/149

Popper, K. (2012). The Open Society and Its Enemies. Routledge. p. 581.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23756/sp.v11i2.1372

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Bekesi B Aron

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Science & Philosophy - Journal of Epistemology, Science and Philosophy. ISSN 2282-7757; eISSN  2282-7765.