Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process in Engineering Education

M Tirumala Devi, Sameena Afreen, V Shyam Prasad, Abdul Majeed, G. Mahender Reddy

Abstract


Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) provides a mathematical technique to formulate a problem as a hierarchical structure and believes in an amalgamation of quantitative and qualitative criteria. It is this uniqueness of AHP that makes it one of the important inclusive systems, considered to make decisions with multiple criteria. This paper focuses on conducting Analytic Hierarchy Process, based on the data collected from several Engineering colleges in the state of Telangana. This paper aims to understand the reasons for removing the staple Engineering streams such as Mechanical engineering, Production engineering, Electronics and Instrumentation engineering and introducing new and contemporary streams such as Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning and Internet of Things. The World Economic Forum’s latest “Future of Jobs” report highlights the impact of ‘double disruption’ of Automation, followed by COVID-19. The report indicates that while 85 million jobs will be displaced, 47% of core skills will change by 2025. The topic thus is of immense value since it looks closely at the paradigm shift mentioned above and its further consequences. The result of the present study would be helpful to indicate the exact rankings of the programming and non-programming branches in the engineering field and thus would be instrumental in gauging learners’ inclination towards studying specific branches. This paper aims to analyze the growing demand of programming branches over traditional, non-programming branches. 


Keywords


Analytic Hierarchy Process, Pair wise comparison, Priority Vector.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Angelis DI, Lee CY. 1996. Strategic investment analysis using activity-based costing concepts and analytical hierarchy process techniques. Int J Prod Res. 34(5):1331–1345.

Brans JP, Vincke P, Mareschal B. 1986. How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur J Oper Res. 24(2):228–238.

C. L. Hwang, K. Yoon, 1981, “Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications”, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.

Hwang C.L. and Yoon K, 1981, “Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications”, Springer, Berlin.

Kousalya P, Shyam Prasad V, “Analytic Hierarchy Process-An Efficient Decision-Making Technique”, Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol.11, No.2, 2015, pp.224-228

Kousalya P, Shyam Prasad V, “Role of Consistency in Analytic Hierarchy Process –Consistency Improvement Methods”, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol.10, Issue.29, 2017, pp.1-5.

Marzouk M, Amer O, El-Said M. 2013. Feasibility study of industrial projects using Simos’ procedure. J CivEngManage.19(1):59–68.

Roy B. 1991. The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision. 31(1):49–73.

Saaty TL. 1980. The analytical hierarchy process. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.

Suhr J. 1999. The choosing by advantages decision making system. Connecticut (CT): Greenwood Publishing Group.

Xu X. 2001. The SIR method: a superiority and inferiority ranking method for multiple criteria decision making. Eur J Oper Res. 131(3):587–602.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23755/rm.v45i0.1025

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 M Tirumala Devi, Sameena Afreen, V Shyam Prasad

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Ratio Mathematica - Journal of Mathematics, Statistics, and Applications. ISSN 1592-7415; e-ISSN 2282-8214.