Minimum measurement uncertainty in quantum systems subject to high energy fluctuations

Piero Chiarelli

Abstract


The stochastic generalization of the Madelung quantum hydrodynamics incorporates the fluctuations of the mass density into quantum equations induced by the gravitational background noise, a form of dark energy,. This model successfully addresses key aspects of quantum to classical transition through the definition of quantum potential length of interaction in addition to the De Broglie length, beyond which coherent quantum behavior and wavefunction evolution is perturbed or even deeply modified. The stochastic quantum hydrodynamic model emphasizes that an external environment is unnecessary, asserting that the stochastic behavior leading to wave-function collapse and macroscopic classical behavior with the Einstein realism can be an inherent property of physics in a spacetime with fluctuating metrics. The theory establishes a coherent link between the uncertainty principle and the constancy of light speed, aligning seamlessly with finite information transmission speed. Within quantum mechanics submitted to fluctuations, the stochastic quantum hydrodynamic model derives the indeterminacy relation between energy and time, offering insights into measurement processes impossible within a finite time interval in a truly quantum global system. The model offers also how the uncertainty relations modify themselves in an open quantum system submitted to fluctuations offering the possibility of describing how quantum mechanics can modify itself in nuclear and elementary particle physics up to the behavior of high energy black hole states. The  self-consistency of the model lies in its ability to describe the dynamics of wavefunction collapse and the measure process within its mathematical structure. Additionally, the theory resolves the Einstein determinism and the pre-existing reality problem by showing that large-scale systems naturally self-decay into decoherent classical states stable in time without observer or measuring apparatus.

Full Text:

PDF

References


A., Einstein, B., Podolsky, and N., Rosen, “Can quantum-mechanical

description of physical reality be considered complete?,” Phys. Rev.,

vol. 47 , p. 777 (1935), http://www.galileoprincipia.org/docs/epr-argument.pdf.

N., Bohr, “Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be

considered complete?” Phys. Rev. Vol. 48, p. 696 (1935),

www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/bohr-/EPRBohr.pdf

E., Nelson, Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation from Newtonian Mechanics.

Phys. Rev.1966, 150, 1079.

J., von Neumann, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik,

Springer, Berlin (1951).

J.,von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics; Beyer, R.T.,

Translator; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1955.

J. S., Bell: “On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox” Physics Vol. 1, 195

(1964), www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/bell.pdf

D. Bohm, "A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of 'Hidden

Variables' I and II." Physical Review, Vol. 85, Issue 2, pp. 166-179 (1952).

R. M. Santilli. "A Quantitative Representation of Particle Entanglements via

Bohm's Hidden Variable According to Hadronic Mechanics." Progress in Physics,

Vol. 1, pp. 150-159 (2002).

R. M., Santilli,: Studies on the classical determinism predicted by A. Einstein, B.

Podolsky and N. Rosen, textit{Ratio Mathematica} {bf 37}, 5-23 (2019),

http://www.eprdebates.org/docs/epr-paper-ii.pdf.

R. M., Santilli, Studies on A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen prediction that

quantum mechanics is not a complete theory, II: Apparent proof of the EPR argument,

textit{Ratio Mathematica} {bf 38}, 71-138 (2020),

http://eprdebates.org/docs/epr-review-ii.pdf.

A., Muktibodh: Santilli's recovering of Einstein's determinism, textit{Progress

in Physics,} in press (2024), . http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/muktibodh

pdf.

P., Chiarelli, Quantum-to-Classical Coexistence: Wavefunction Decay Kinetics,

Photon Entanglement, and Q-Bits. Symmetry 2023, 15, 2210.

https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15122210 H

R., Tsekov, Bohmian mechanics versus Madelung quantum hydrodynamics,

arXiv:0904.0723v8 [quantum-phys] (2011).

P., Chiarelli, The Stochastic Nature of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics,

Hadronic J. 46 (2023) 3, 315 .

E.Z., Madelung, Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer form, Phys. 1926, 40,

–326.

L., Jánossy, Zum hydrodynamischen Modell der Quantenmechanik. Z. Phys.

, 169, 79.

I.B.; Birula, M.; Cieplak, J., Kaminski, Theory of Quanta; Oxford University

Press: New York, NY, USA, 1992; pp. 87–115.

P. , Chiarelli, Can fluctuating quantum states acquire the classical behavior on

large scale? J. Adv. Phys. 2013, 2, 139–163.

Y.B.; Rumer, M.S., Ryvkin, Thermodynamics, Statistical Physics, and Kinetics;

Mir Publishers: Moscow, Russia, 1980; pp. 444–454

D., Bressanini, An Accurate and Compact Wave Function for the 4 He Dimer.

EPL 2011, 96, 23001. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/96/23001.

E.P., Gross, Structure of a quantized vortex in boson systems. Il Nuovo C.

,20, 454–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02731494.

P.P., Pitaevskii, Vortex lines in an Imperfect Bose Gas. Sov. Phys. JETP 1961,

, 451–454.

P., Chiarelli, The Gravity of the Classical Klein-Gordon Field, Symmetry 2019,

, 322; doi:10.3390/sym11030322 .

P., Chiarelli, Quantum Geometrization of Spacetime in General Relativity, BP

International, 2023, ISBN 978-81-967198-7-6 (Print), ISBN 978-81-967198-3-8

(eBook), DOI: 10.9734/bpi/mono/978-81-967198-7-6 .




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23755/rm.v52i0.1622

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Piero Chiarelli

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Ratio Mathematica - Journal of Mathematics, Statistics, and Applications. ISSN 1592-7415; e-ISSN 2282-8214.