Ecnotopie microbiotiche. Appunti per una sociologia dell'intestino
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23756/sp.v14i2.1760Keywords:
Microbiome, Intestinal socialization, Biosocial subjectivity, Biopolitics, Holobiont, Infra-individual habitusAbstract
The intestinal microbiome has emerged as one of the most generative and contested objects of contemporary bioscience, unsettling longstanding assumptions about the boundaries of the human organism and biological individuality. This article approaches the microbiome as a biosocial device through which the relations between embodiment, subjectivity, and the government of life are being reconfigured. Drawing on the sociology of the body, critical biopolitical theory, and relational ontology, it introduces the concept of intestinal socialization to describe the dual process by which microbial life is simultaneously shaped by socio-historical conditions and culturally constructed as a constitutive dimension of contemporary selfhood. Engaging with Foucauldian biopolitics, Bourdieu's theory of habitus, and the philosophies of Serres and Nancy, the article proposes the notions of infra-individual habitus and microbiotic ecnotopia as theoretical resources for thinking the intestine not merely as a site of medicalization, but as the originary locus of a subjectivity constitutively inhabited by its own porosity.
Per leggere l'articolo completo, accedi con un abbonamento attivo. (To read the full article, log in with an active subscription.)
References
Bachtin, M. (1965). Tvorčestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaja kul'tura srednevekov'ja i Renessansa. Moskva: Chudožestvennaja literatura. (Trad. it.: L'opera di Rabelais e la cultura popolare. Riso, carnevale e festa nella tradizione medievale e rinascimentale. Torino: Einaudi, 1979).
Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Minuit.
Carabotti, M., Scirocco, A., Maselli, M. A., Severi, C. (2015). "The gut-brain axis: interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems". Annals of Gastroenterology, 28(2), 203-209.
Clarke, A. E., Shim, J. K., Mamo, L., Fosket, J. R., Fishman, J. R. (2003). "Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine". American Sociological Review, 68(2), 161-194.
Crawford, R. (1980). "Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life". International Journal of Health Services, 10(3), 365-388.
Cryan, J. F., Dinan, T. G. (2012). "Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour". Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(10), 701-712.
Foucault, M. (1963). Naissance de la clinique: Une archéologie du regard médical. Paris: PUF.
Foucault, M. (1976). Histoire de la sexualité I: La volonté de savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
Gilbert, S. F., Sapp, J., Tauber, A. I. (2012). "A symbiotic view of life: We have never been individuals". Quarterly Review of Biology, 87(4), 325-341.
Krieger, N. (2005). "Embodiment: a conceptual glossary for epidemiology". Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59(5), 350-355.
Kwak, S., Usyk, M., Beggs, D., Choi, H., Ahdoot, D., Wu, F., Maceda, L., Li, H., Im, E.-O., Han, H.-R., Lee, E., Wu, A. H., Hayes, R. B., Ahn, J. (2024). "Sociobiome – Individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status influence the gut microbiome in a multi-ethnic population in the US". npj Biofilms and Microbiomes, 10, 19.
Landecker, H. (2013). "Post-Industrial Metabolism: Fat Knowledge". Public Culture, 25(3), 495-522.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Le Visible et l'Invisible. Paris: Gallimard.
Nancy, J.-L. (2000). L'Intrus. Paris: Galilée.
Nancy, J.-L. (1996). Être singulier pluriel. Paris: Galilée.
Pagano, U. (2025). La socialità dell'essere. Riflessioni sociologiche su Essere singolare plurale di Jean-Luc Nancy. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
Rajan, K. S. (2006). Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham: Duke University Press.
Rose, N. (2007). The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rose, N., Novas, C. (2005). "Biological Citizenship". In A. Ong, S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, pp. 439-463. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The journal is committed to real and immediate open access for academic work. All of the journal articles are free to access immediately from the date of publication. There are no charge for readers to download articles and reviews for their own scholarly use. Benefits of open access for authors, include:
- Free access for all users worldwide
- Increased visibility and readership
- Rapid publication
- No spatial constraints
- Authors can share their research papers on their personal web-pages (i.e. ResearchGate, etc.)
Copyright and Licensing Terms
SCIENCE & PHILOSOPHY publishes open access articles under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open-access article, as long as the author is properly attributed. Copyright on any research article published by SCIENCE & PHILOSOPHY is retained by the author(s). Authors grant SCIENCE & PHILOSOPHY a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
For further information visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. The following logo will appear in any paper that will be published from the volume number 31/2016 onwards:
