Sketching a Theology based on Historical Science

Robert W.P. Luk

Abstract


St. Thomas Aquinas envisaged theology to be a kind of scientia which was considered as a kind of first cause science. However, science of that time is different from “modern” science. Recently, a theory of scientific study is developed, which outlines science by a theory and some models similar to knowledge in physics. According to this theory, (modern) sciences organize their knowledge consisting of theories, models and experiments interacting with physical situations. Perhaps, it is possible to organize knowledge of Christian theology in a similar way as science (from the perspective of Christian belief). Doing this requires extensive and deep knowledge of both science and Christian theology. This paper only attempts to sketch such a theology, which is coined scientia theology to distinguish it from the existing scientific theology of McGrath. Our theology consists of a theory that is outlined here, several historical event models (like the crucifixion model and the last supper model) as well as various experiments that provide us with observations supporting the related models and principles. The theory of our theology interacts with the models which may retrodict or are supported by observations from the experiments that interact with the physical situations.

Keywords


Scientia, First Principle, Aquinas, Theory, Christianity, Historical Science

Full Text:

PDF

References


Beyers, J. (2016) How scientific is theology really? A matter of credibility. HTS Theological Studies 72(4): a3449.

Calatayud, B.H. (2022) The man of the Shroud of Turin: is he dead or alive? Scientia et Fides 10(1): 91-114.

Cleland, C.E. (2001) Historical science, experimental science, and the scientific method. Geology 29(11): 987-990.

Cleland, C.E. (2002) Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science. Philosophy of Science 69(3): 474-496.

Cruz, J.C. (1991) Eucharistic Miracles and Eucharistic Phenomena in the Lives of the Saints. TAN Books: Charlotte, North Carolina.

Dalleur, P. (2021) Fatima pictures and testimonials: in-depth analysis. Scientia et Fides 9(1): 9-45.

Damper, R.I. (2022) Science and religion in conflict, part 1: preliminaries. To appear in Foundations of Science.

Di Lazzaro, P., Murra, D., Santoni, A., Fanti G., Nichelatti, E. and Baldacchini, G. (2010) Deep ultraviolet radiation simulates the Turin shroud image. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology 54(4): 0403021-0403026.

Fazio, G. (2019) The shroud body image generation. Immanent or transcendent action? Scientia et Fides 8(1): 33-42.

Fernández-Capo, J. (2015) Faith and science dialogue in the shroud of Turin. Scientia et Fides 3(1): 37-59.

Grey, C. (2021) A theologian’s perspective on science-engaged theology. Modern Theology 37(2): 489-494.

Harrison, P. (2021) A historian’s perspective on science-engaged theology. Modern Theology 37(2): 476-482.

Healy, N.M. (2009) What is systematic theology? International Journal of Systematic Theology 11(1): 24-39.

Holzer, V. (2014) Theology: a fundamental science? Recherches de Science Religieuse 102: 585-608.

Jacyna-Onyszkiewicz, Z., Sobaniec-Lotowska, M.E., Sulkowski, S.T. Kakareko, A. and Rucki, M. (2018) Eucharistic perseverance from the perspectives of exact sciences. Teologia i Cztowiek 43(3): 81-98.

Jong, J. (2021) A scientist’s perspective on science-engaged theology. Modern Theology 37(2): 483-488.

King, M.B. (1991) Is scientific study of religion possible? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 30(1): 108-113.

Krzywosz, M. (2016) Sociological aspect of miracles and apparitions in contemporary Poland. The Religious Studies Review 4(262): 43-56.

Loncar, S.J. (2021) Science and religion: an origins story. Zygon 56(1): 275-296.

Luk, R.W.P. (2010) Understanding scientific study via process modeling. Foundations of Science 15(1): 49-78.

Luk, R.W.P. (2017) A theory of scientific study. Foundations of Science 22(1): 11-38.

Luk, R.W.P. (2018) On the implications and extensions of Luk’s theory and model of scientific study. Foundations of Science 23(1): 103-118.

Luk, R.W.P. (2019) Why is Bayesian confirmation theory rarely practiced? Science & Philosophy 7(1): 3- 20.

Luk, R.W.P. (2020) Insights in how computer science can be a science. Science & Philosophy 8(2): 17-46.

Luk, R.W.P. (2021) Christianity & Science in harmony? Science & Philosophy 9(2): 62 - 81.

Luk, R.W.P. (2022) Why is information retrieval a scientific discipline? To appear in Foundations of Science.

McAvoy, T. (2021) On radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin. International Journal of Archaeology 9(2): 34-44.

McGrath, A.E. (2001) A Scientific Theology: Nature. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.: Grand Rapids, Michigan.

McGrath, A.E. (2002) A Scientific Theology: Reality. T&T Clark Ltd.: Edinburgh, Scotland.

McGrath, A.E. (2003) A Scientific Theology: Theory. T&T Clark Ltd.: London, UK.

Perry, J. and Leidenhag, J. (2021) What is science-engaged theology? Modern Theology 37(2): 245-253.

Rainville, S., Thompson, J. K., Myers, E. G., Brown, J. M., Dewey, M. S., Kessler, E. G., Jr., Deslattes, R. D., Börner, H. G., Jentschel, M., Mutti, P. and Pritchard, D. E. (2005). A direct test of E = mc2. Nature 438(22): 1096–1097.

Ritchie, S.L. (2021) Integrated physicality and the absence of God: spiritual technologies in theological context. Modern Theology 37(2): 296-315.

Serafini, F. (2021) A Cardiologist Examines Jesus: The Stunning Science behind Eucharistic Miracles. Sophia Institute Press: Manchester, New Hampshire.

STERA Inc. (2021) The shroud of Turin website. http://www.shroud.com (accessed on 30/9/2021).

Strobel, L. (1998) The Case for Christ: A Journalist’s Personal Investigation of the Evidence for Christ. Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House.

Tesoriero, R. (2007) Reason to believe: a personal story. Ron Tesoriero: Australia.

Tesoriero, R. (2021) Reason to believe. https://reasontobelieve.com.au (accessed on 30/9/2021).

Tucker, A. (2011) Historical science, over- and underdetermined: a study of Darwin’s inference of origins. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62(4): 805-829.

Turner, G. (1997) St Thomas Aquinas on the “scientific” nature of theology. New Blackfriars 78(921): 464-476.

Van den Brink, G. (2019) How theology stopped being regina scientiarum – and how its story continues. Studies in Christian Ethics 32(4): 442-454.

Webster, J. (2009) Principles of systematic theology. International Journal of Systematic Theology 11(1): 56-71.

Wikipedia (2021) List of Marian apparitions. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Marian_apparitions (accessed on 30/9/2021).

Willesee, M.R. (2017) Scientists investigate signs of Jesus Christ. 7NEWS Spotlight (Documentary). https://youtube.com/watch?v=mWmdXqlhjSs (accessed on 11/11/2021).

Williams, A.N. (2009) What is systematic theology? International Journal of Systematic Theology 11(1): 40-55.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23756/sp.v10i1.728

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Robert W.P. Luk

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Science & Philosophy - Journal of Epistemology, Science and Philosophy. ISSN 2282-7757; eISSN  2282-7765.