On the relation of free bodies, inertial sets and arbitrariness

Mario Alberto Natiello, Hernán Gustavo Solari

Abstract


We present a fully relational definition of inertial systems based in the No Arbitrariness Principle, that eliminates the need for absolute inertial frames of reference or distinguished reference systems as the ``fixed stars'' in order to formulate Newtonian mechanics. The historical roots of this approach to mechanics are discussed as well.
The work is based in part in the constructivist perspective of space advanced by Piaget. We argue that inertial systems admit approximations and that what is of practical use are precisely such approximations.
We finally discuss a slightly larger class of systems that we call ``relatively inertial'' which are the fundamental systems in a relational view of mechanics.

Keywords


Relationism; Constructivism; Newtonian Mechanics;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aristotle. Physics. The Internet Classics Archive, 1994–2010. URL http://classics.mit.edu/index.html. Translation by R. P. Hardie and R. K. Gaye.

Julian B. Barbour. Relational concepts of space and time. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 33(3):251–274, 1982. ISSN 00070882, 14643537.

URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/687224.

Horst-Heino von Borzeszkowski and Renate Wahsner. Mach’s Criticism of Newton and Einstein’s Reading of Mach: The Stimulating Role of Two Misunderstandings, volume 6 of Einstein Studies. Birkhäuser, 1995.

Robert H Dicke. Encyclopedia of Physics, chapter Gravitation, pages 364–367. Addison-Wesler Publishing Co., 1981.

Robert DiSalle. Conventionalism and the origins of the inertial frame concept. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1990:139–147, 1990. ISSN 02708647. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/193063.

Robert DiSalle. Absolute space and newton’s theory of relativity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of

Modern Physics, 71:232–244, 2020. ISSN 1355-2198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2020.04.003. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355219819300747.

Albert Einstein. On the relativity principle and the conclusions drawn from it. Jahrb Radioaktivitat Elektronik, 4:411–462, 1907.

Galileo Galilei. Dialogs concernig Two New Sciences. The Macmillan Company, 1914. Translated by H. Crew and A de Salvio.

H Goldstein. Classical Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1980.

Heinrich Hertz and John Thomas Walley. The principles of mechanics presented in a new form. Macmillian and Company, Limited, 1899. URL

http://www.archive.org/details/principlesofmech00hertuoft. Original in German of 1894, posthumous work.

Edmund Husserl. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First book. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1983.

Translator F. Kersten.

Ludwig Lange. Die geschichtliche Entwickelung des Bewegungsbegriffes und ihrvoraussichtliches Endergebniss: Ein Beitrag zur historischen Kritik der mechanischen Principien, volume 1. W. Engelmann, 1886.

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Exchange of papers between Leibniz and Clarke. Translated by Jonathan Bennett. Last modified April, 2007. URL

https://earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/leibniz1715_2.pdf.

Ernst Mach. The Science of Mechanics. A Critical and Historical Account of its Development. The open court publishing co., Chicago and London, 1919.

Translated by Thomas J McKormack.

William HB McAuliffe. How did abduction get confused with inference to the best explanation? Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly

Journal in American Philosophy, 51(3):300–319, 2015.

Isaac Newton. Philosophiæ naturalis principia mathematica (“Mathematical principles of natural philosophy”). London, 1687. Consulted: Motte translation (1723) published by Daniel Adee publisher (1846). And the Motte translation revised by Florian Cajori (1934) published by Univ of California Press (1999).

Charles Peirce. The Philosophical Writings of Peirce. Dover Publications, 1955. Selected and edited by Justus Buchler.

Charles Peirce. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Charlottesville, Va. InteLex Corporation electronic edition edition, 1994.

Herbert Pfister. Ludwig lange on the law of inertia. The European Physical Journal H, 39(2):245–250, April 2014. ISSN 2102-6467. URL https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2013-40039-2.

Jean Piaget. The Construction Of Reality In The Child. International Library of Psychology. Routledge, 1999. ISBN 0415210003,9780415210003.

H G Solari and M A Natiello. A constructivist view of newton’s mechanics. Foundations of Science, 24:307, 2018. URL

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-018-9573-z.

Heinrich Streintz. Die physikalischen Grundlagen der Mechanik. Teubner, 1883.

James Thomson. 2. on the law of inertia; the principle of chronometry; and the

principle of absolute clinural rest, and of absolute rotation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 12:568–578, 1884.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23756/sp.v9i2.669

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Mario Alberto Natiello, Hernán Gustavo Solari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Science & Philosophy - Journal of Epistemology, Science and Philosophy. ISSN 2282-7757; eISSN  2282-7765.