The Upraise of Instrumentalism in the Natural Sciences and its Consequences

Mario Alberto Natiello, Hernán Gustavo Solari

Abstract


The paper analyses the historical and epistemological rise of instrumentalism in the natural sciences, tracing its roots to the second industrial revolution and focusing particularly on the German scientific and educational system. The authors argue that instrumentalism, understood as the reduction of scientific theories to predictive or utilitarian tools, cannot be separated from the processes of specialisation, state intervention, and the transformation of science into an economic resource. The paper contrasts this instrumentalist approach with the Enlightenment tradition of rational empiricism, emphasising the loss of critical reason, conceptual understanding, and unity of knowledge. The discussion extends to twentieth-century physics, technoscience, and contemporary Artificial Intelligence, which is presented as the ultimate form of instrumental knowledge devoid of genuine understanding.

Keywords


Instrumentalism; Rational Empiricism; Technoscience; Artificial Intelligence; Philosophy of Science

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aprile P., Il nuovo elogio dell’imbecille, Libreria Pienogiorno, 2022.

Assis A., Weber’s Electrodynamics, in Weber’s Electrodynamics, vol. 66 of Fundamental Theories of Physics, Springer, 1994, ISBN 978-94-017-3670-1.

Assis A.K.T., Wilhelm Weber’s Main Works on Electrodynamics Translated into English, vol. 5, Apeiron, 2024.

Baird D., Hughes R.I., Nordmann A., Heinrich Hertz: Classical Physicist, Modern Philosopher, Springer Science & Business Media, 1998.

Beiser F.C., After Hegel, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford, 2014.

Bourdieu P., The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason, in Biagioli M. (ed.), The Science Studies Reader, Routledge, New York, 1999, pp. 31–50.

Burks A.W., Peirce’s theory of abduction, Philosophy of Science, 1, 301–306, 1946.

Bush V., Science, the Endless Frontier, Office of Scientific Research and Development, USA, 1945.

Cahan D., Werner Siemens and the origin of the Physikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt, 1872–1887, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 12(2), 253–283, 1982, https://doi.org/10.2307/27757497

Cahan D., The institutional revolution in German physics, 1865–1914, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 15(2), 1–65, 1985.

Carnap R., The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis, in Ayer A.J. (ed.), Logical Positivism, The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois, 1959, pp. 60–81.

Chomsky N., The Chomsky Reader, Pantheon, New York, 1987.

Chuang Tzu, The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu, Columbia University Press, 1968.

Córdoba M., Dupré J., Ferro M., Holik F., Fernandez Larrosa P.N., Blaustein M., What Is Liberty? Philosophical and Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Free Will, Available from authors, 2025.

D’Agostino S., Il pensiero scientifico di Maxwell e la teoria del campo elettromagnetico nella memoria “On Faraday’s Lines of Force”, Scientia, 103, 291, 1968.

D’Agostino S., The Bild conception of physical theory: Helmholtz, Hertz, and Schrödinger, Physics in Perspective, 6(4), 372–389, 2004.

Dewey J., Essays in Experimental Logic, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1916.

Dewey J., The Later Works, Southern Illinois University Press, 2008.

Dingle H., Relativity and electromagnetism: An epistemological appraisal, Philosophy of Science, 27(3), 233–253, 1960.

Dingle H., Science at the Crossroads, Martin Brian and O’Keefe, 1972.

Dirac P.A., Discussion of the infinite distribution of electrons in the theory of the positron, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 30, 150–163, 1934.

Dirac P.A.M., The quantum theory of the electron, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 117(778), 610–624, 1928.

Einstein A., On the electrodynamics of moving bodies, Annalen der Physik, 17, 50, 1905.

Einstein A., On a heuristic point of view about the creation and conversion of light, Annalen der Physik, 17(6), 132–148, 1905.

Einstein A., Über den Äther, Verhandlungen der Schweizerischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 105(2), 85–93, 1924.

Einstein A., Physics and reality, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 221(3), 349–382, 1936, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-0032(36)91047-5

Einstein A., Considerations concerning the fundaments of theoretical physics, Science, 91(2369), 487–492, 1940.

Einstein A., Podolsky B., Rosen N., Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Physical Review, 47, 777–780, 1935.

Einstein A., Besso M., Puigcerver M., Speziali P., Correspondencia con Michele Besso: 1903–1955, Tusquets Editores, 1994.

Essen L., The Special Theory of Relativity: A Critical Analysis, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1971.

Essen L., Relativity and time signals, Wireless World, 84(1514), 44–45, 1978.

Feynman R.P., QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter, Princeton University Press, 1983.

Gibney E., What does quantum mechanics say about reality?, Nature, 643, 1175–1179, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-02342-y

Heikkilä M., Nobody knows how AI works, MIT Technology Review, 2024.

Helmholtz H., Popular Lectures on Scientific Subjects, First Series, D. Appleton and Company, 1873.

Hertz H., Electric Waves, MacMillan and Co., 1893.

Holm-Nielsen L.B., Promoting science and technology for development: The World Bank’s millennium science initiative, First International Senior Fellows Meeting, Wellcome Trust, London, 2002.

Horkheimer M., Eclipse of Reason, Oxford University Press, 1947.

Humboldt W. von, The Sphere and Duties of Government (The Limits of State Action), 1792, printed 1854.

Ingenieros J., The Mediocre Man, 2017.

James W., The Meaning of Truth, Project Gutenberg, 2004.

Kant I., An answer to the question: What is enlightenment?, Berlinische Monatsschrift, 1784.

Kant I., The Conflict of the Faculties, Cambridge University Press, 1798.

Kragh H.S., Dirac: A Scientific Biography, Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Kuhn T.S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 4th edition, University of Chicago Press, 2012.

Lindzey G., Aronson E., Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd edition, Random House, 1985.

Lipton P., Inference to the Best Explanation, 2nd edition, Routledge, 2004.

Mach E., The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of Its Development, Open Court Publishing, 1974.

Maxwell J.C., Address to the Mathematical and Physical Sections of the British Association (1870), in Niven W.D. (ed.), The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, vol. II, Dover Publications, 2003.

McAuliffe W.H., How did abduction get confused with inference to the best explanation?, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 51(3), 300–319, 2015.

Mill J.S., On Liberty, The Floating Press, 2009.

Natiello M.A., Solari H.G., On the removal of infinities from divergent series, Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 29, 13, 2015.

Nisbet R.A., The Degradation of the Academic Dogma: The University in America, 1945–1970, John Dewey Society Lectureship Series, 1971.

Ortega y Gasset J., The Revolt of the Masses, W.W. Norton & Company, 1930.

Peirce C.S., Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, InteLex Corporation, 1994.

Phipps T.E., Invariant physics, Physics Essays, 27(4), 591–597, 2014.

Phipps T.E. Jr., Old Physics for New, Apeiron, Montreal, 2006.

Popper K., Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge Classics, 2012.

Roth W.-M., Enculturation: Acquisition of conceptual blind spots and epistemological prejudices, British Educational Research Journal, 27, 5–27, 2001.

Schrödinger E., The present situation in quantum mechanics, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 124, 323–338, 1980.

Smolin L., Harnad J., The trouble with physics, The Mathematical Intelligencer, 30(3), 66–69, 2008.

Solari H.G., Natiello M.A., A constructivist view of Newton’s mechanics, Foundations of Science, 24, 307, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-018-9573-z

Solari H.G., Natiello M.A., Rational Empiricism: The Idealist View of (Elementary) Physics, Lund Open Books, 2025, https://doi.org/10.37852/oblu.330

Spinoza B., On the Improvement of the Understanding, Project Gutenberg, 2014.

von Humboldt A., Wilhelm von Humboldt’s Gesammelte Werke, vol. I, G. Reimer, Berlin, 1841.

Whewell W., The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, vol. 1, J.W. Parker, 1840.

Will D.H., Large language models can do jaw-dropping things, but nobody knows exactly why, MIT Technology Review, 2024.

Wise M.N., On the relation of physical science to history in late nineteenth-century Germany, in Graham L., Lepenies W., Weingart P. (eds.), Functions and Uses of Disciplinary Histories, Springer, Dordrecht, 1983, pp. 3–34, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7035-9_1

Wittgenstein L., Philosophical Investigations, Basil Blackwell, 1986.

Wittgenstein L., Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Project Gutenberg, 2025.

Woit P., Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory and the Continuing Challenge to Unify the Laws of Physics, Random House, 2011.

Yeo R., Defining Science: William Whewell, Natural Knowledge and Public Debate in Early Victorian Britain, Cambridge University Press, 1993.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23756/sp.v13i2.1730

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Mario Alberto Natiello, Hernán Gustavo Solari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Science & Philosophy - Journal of Epistemology, Science and Philosophy. ISSN 2282-7757; eISSN  2282-7765.