Citizen Science: which kind of public participation is epistemologically feasible?

Raffaele Mascella, Davide Fazio

Abstract


Projects concerning the participation of citizens to the scientific research have become very popular in recent years. However, the literature seems not offer much foundational investigations into the epistemological conditions that make citizens’ contribution to science a fruitful and rigorous activity. Research institutions and citizens, understood as entities bearing generally distinct requests, practices and goals, knowledge and skills, are totally misaligned. In order to participate to collaborative research, citizens need an epistemic and methodological literacy to overcome common sense ideas, towards an ever adequate vision of phenomena under investigation. Besides  understanding the social advantages introduced by the participatory dimension, it is therefore necessary to analyze the related epistemological problems, to understand to what extent and in what respect to the participation of citizens to research processes might be regarded as truly advantageous from an epistemological perspective.

Keywords


Citizen science; Participatory Science; Co-creation; Common sense

Full Text:

PDF

References


R.A. Ankeny, H. Barrie. Learning Not Just From But With Citizens: The Importance of Co-Design in Health-Related Social Research. The American Journal of Bioethics, 19(8), p. 54–56. 2019.

N. Baron. Escape from the Ivory Tower. A Guide to Making Your Science Matter. Washington: Ed. Island Press. 2010.

F. Baum, C. MacDougall, D. Smith. Participatory Action Research. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health, 60(10), 854–857. 2006.

R. Bonney, H.R. Ballard, E. Jordan, H. McCallie, T. Phillips, J. Shirk, C.C. Wilderman. Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Washington: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE). 2009a.

R: Bonney, C.B. Cooper, J. Dickinson, S. Kelling, T. Phillips, K.V. Rosenberg, J. Shirk. Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977–984. 2009b.

M. Boon, S. Van Baalen. Epistemology for Interdisciplinary research – shifting philosophical paradigms of science. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 9(1), 16. 2019.

B. Cooke, U. Kothari. The case for participation as tyranny. In B. Cooke, U. Kothari (eds.). Participation: the new tyranny?, 1–15. New York: Ed. Zed Books Ltd. 2001.

F. Cornish, N. Breton, U. Moreno-Tabarez et al. Participatory action research. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 34 (3). 2023.

A. Cornwall, R. Jewkes. What Is Participatory Research?. Social Science and Medicine, 41, 1667–1676. 1995.

M. Dorato. Disinformazione scientifica e democrazia. La competenza dell'esperto e l'autonomia del Cittadino. Milano: Ed. Raffaello Cortina. 2020.

ECSA (2015). Ten principles of citizen science. Berlin.

ECSA (2020). ECSA’s characteristics of citizen science. Berlin.

R. Ellis, C. Waterton. Environmental citizenship in the making: the participation of volunteer naturalists in UK biological recording and biodiversity policy. Science and Public Policy, 31(2), 95–105. 2004.

P.K. Feyerabend. Against Method (4th ed.). New York: Ed. Verso Books. 1975-2010.

N. Ghinea. Citizen Science and The Politicization of Epistemology. The American Journal of Bioethics, 19(8), 58–60. 2019.

M. Gibbons, C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, M. Trow. The New Production of Knowledge. London: Ed. SAGE Publications. 1994.

C. Grieffenhagen, W. Sherman. Kuhn and conceptual change: On the analogy between conceptual changes in science and children. Science Education, 17, 1–26. 2008.

M. Haklay, D. Dörler, F. Heigl, M. Manzoni, S. Hecker, K. Vohland. What Is Citizen Science? The Challenges of Definition. In K. Vohland, A. Land-Zandstra, L. Ceccaroni, R. Lemmens, J. Perelló, M. Ponti, R. Samson, K. Wagenknecht (eds.). The Science of Citizen Science. 13–34. Cham: Ed. Springer. 2021.

P. Hoyningen-Huene. Systematicity: The Nature of Science. New York: Ed. Oxford University Press. 2013.

A. Irwin. Citizen science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development. London: Ed. Routledge. 1995.

D. Kahneman. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Ed. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 2011.

T.S. Kuhn. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: Ed. University of Chicago Press. 1962–1996.

C. Lenette. Participatory Action Research. New York: Ed. Oxford University Press. 2022.

R.K. Merton. The Normative Structure of Science. In R.K. Merton (eds.). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, 267–278. Chicago: Ed. University of Chicago Press. 1973.

A. Miller-Rushing, R. Primack, R. Bonney. The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 285–290. 2012.

E. Nagel. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York: Ed. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc. 1961.

K. Popper. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Ed. Harper & Row. 1959.

B.J. Strasser, J. Baudry, D. Mahr, G. Sanchez, E. Tancoigne. ‘Citizen Science’? Rethinking Science and Public Participation. Science & Technology Studies, 32(2), 52–76. 2019.

A. Wiggins, J. Wilbanks. (2019). The Rise of Citizen Science in Health and Biomedical Research. The American Journal of Bioethics, 19(8), 3–14. 2019.

J. M. Ziman. Public knowledge. An essay concerning the social dimension of science. Cambridge: Ed. Cambridge University Press. 1968.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23756/sp.v12i1.1625

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Raffaele Mascella, Davide Fazio

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Science & Philosophy - Journal of Epistemology, Science and Philosophy. ISSN 2282-7757; eISSN  2282-7765.